I have long been curious to see a production of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin.” I
somehow missed the Mint Theater’s 1997 rendition, so when I heard that
the Metropolitan Playhouse had scheduled it as part of a season about
stereotypes I was determined to be there. Director Alex Roe has staged
it with considerable invention given the tiny stage and 10-person cast,
and he’s used the complete 1852 text by George L. Aiken, adapted from
Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel. He’s also brought a contemporary
sensibility to the work, having blacks play whites and vice versa and
directing the actors to mine the material for its emotional truth
rather than play it in the original floridly melodramatic style. The
result is absolutely fascinating.
Though “Cabin” still holds the record as the “most-often performed
American drama,” according to the theater’s press release, I imagine
most Americans are familiar with the story and characters thanks to
Jerome Robbins’ superb ballet adaptation for “The King and I.” I was
surprised to discover that Simon Legree is not the slave owner chasing
Eliza across the ice. He doesn’t even show up until Act 5 of this
six-act play. Aiken begins with the story of slaves Eliza and George,
who are owned by separate masters. George, abused by his owner, decides
to flee to the north, where he will earn enough money to buy the
freedom of his wife and young son, who have a kindly owner. But Eliza’s
owner is in debt, and when she learns her master is being forced to
sell her son as part of paying it off, Eliza also flees. Her famous
river crossing ends Act 1. Other stories are interwoven. There is
“Uncle” Tom, a deeply religious older slave who is also sold off by
Eliza’s owner to the well-meaning St. Clare, who gives Tom to his young
daughter, the saintly Eva. Mixed in this story are St. Clare’s cousin
Ophelia, a religious Vermont spinster who disapproves of slavery but
can’t abide blacks, and Topsy, the unruly teenage slave she educates
and ultimately adopts.
Stowe and Aiken are forthright about all kinds of issues that later
generations would refrain from discussing. Masters sleep with their
female slaves in coercive relationships. Slaves are proud of their deep
hatred for whites. An unrepentant unbeliever is a better man than some
Christians. Bigotry isn’t innate (Rodgers and Hammerstein got in
trouble for that one nearly 100 years later). Though stereotypical
dialect is employed, it’s used for uneducated characters, black or
white. There are also educated black characters who speak impeccable
English. Yes, it’s clear that the piece is aimed at educating whites,
and the authors use white characters as the gateway for audiences in an
inevitably condescending manner. But compared, say, to “Gone With the
Wind,” “Cabin” is far more honest. It’s like watching a movie made
before the Hollywood Production Code came in.
Roe has assembled a tight ensemble. Standouts include Marcie Hendersen,
who gives the virtuous Eliza a slight Brechtian edge that cuts the
sentiment; Alex Marshall-Brown, who tears into Topsy with explosive
force; Rick Delaney, who does vividly opposing work as the evil slave
owner Haley and the more-congenial St. Clare; and George Lee Miles, who
endows Tom with an underlying fierceness that makes his religiosity
believable and helps us to at least understand some of the character’s
self-defeating choices. Richard Waits offered a strongly emotional
George and a slyly duplicitous Gumption Cute, a rapscallion character
added by Aiken, presumably for comic relief, but Waits has since left
the production (Rafael Jordan is his replacement).
Seen in close proximity with “A Free Man of Color” and “The Scottsboro
Boys,” “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” definitely felt like a foundational text. It
tells us much about where we’ve come from and how far we may still have
to go.
The Metropolitan Playhouse
revives the Harriet Beecher Stowe classic
By
Michael
Feingold Wednesday, Dec 15
2010
Americans’ desire to blot out the past has always puzzled me.
For
most of my fellow citizens, it seems that history, barring a few easily
recognizable names and dates, does not exist. Culture, likewise with a
few icons excepted, consists strictly of this season’s hot attractions.
It makes no sense. American history and American culture have, for good
or ill, permanently changed the world’s. But Americans’ response to
their own past, increasingly, can be summed up in the sentence, “I
don’t know who (or what) that was.”
It takes the strong jolt of a trip back in time to explain
why.
Americans love change. They revere progress. Educationally,
financially, spiritually, they yearn for their own betterment: The
busiest section of any American bookstores, back when America had
bookstores, was always the self-help section. The one thing Americans
most emphatically don’t aspire to be, in the years ahead, is what they
are. Understandably, getting them to look back at what they were,
decades or centuries ago, is no easy feat. But that’s only half the
explanation: I discovered the second half last week, while watching the
Metropolitan Playhouse perform George L. Aiken’s 1853 stage version of Harriet
Beecher
Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
To see this ancient epic—the actual artifact, not an artsy
deconstruction or a streamlined, p.c’d modernization—is to reveal the
painful truth that makes Americans, who worship change, leap to shriek,
“Dated!” whenever anyone revives a play written before 2008: American
culture hasn’t changed. If anything, it has stood still, constantly
fixated on the same preoccupations. Slavery has been abolished, and the
play’s characters speak in a diction that was arch and artificial even
in its own time, but the conditions that Mrs. Stowe addressed in
fiction, and that Aiken pointed up for the popular stage, still apply
to a startling degree. How perplexing it must be for those with a
superficial faith in progress to look up from their BlackBerries and
find in this relic, the quintessence, in embryo, of their own culture.
For Uncle Tom’s Cabin virtually is American culture.
Viewing
it in something like its authentic form—the Metropolitan, limited in
space and cast size, had to do some condensing—makes you realize why it
swept the world when it appeared, as well as how it shriveled in public
memory into a set of embarrassing stereotypes. That latter process,
too, reveals much about our cultural history. But first came the thing
itself, an immediate success: The year it was published, Stowe’s novel
sold a half-million copies here and in Britain, spawning innumerable
stage adaptations, virtually all pirated. Aiken’s version gained its
semi-official status because the literate generally rated it as the
most faithful to Stowe’s substance.
As Aiken’s script makes clear, Stowe carefully balanced her
picture
of plantation life. She portrayed both benevolent and tyrannical
masters, showing both as ultimately corrupted by slavery’s system.
Through the kindhearted but dissolute planter St. Clare and his prim Vermont
cousin Miss Ophelia, she displayed a potential good side to the South’s
easy intimacy between the races, contrasted to the aloof Northern
distaste that produced de facto segregation. In the runaway slave
George’s spiky debates with his wife, Eliza, and with the whites who
abet their escape, she foresaw black rage and the black impulse toward
cultural separatism as natural outgrowths of the slaves’ quest for the
identity that had been stolen from them. Even the innocently “wicked”
Topsy’s insistence that she “never was born” echoes the immeasurable
bitterness that makes George, in his very first line, wish that he had
never been born.
But Aiken at no time held the field alone. For the next seven
decades, troupes of “Tommers” toured Uncle Tom’s Cabin
everywhere, in productions of every shape and size, from gigantic
spectacles to half-hour “tab” versions that rounded off vaudeville
bills. Long before Jerome
Robbins rendered it as the hypothetical Siamese court ballet,
“Small House of Uncle Thomas,” in The King and I (1951), Uncle
Tom
had become fodder for operetta, musical, pantomime, outdoor drama,
cabaret act, and nearly a dozen movies, the two earliest in 1903.
Stowe had a political mission, and used the elements of
melodrama unhesitatingly to achieve it—though, like her model, Dickens,
she took care to give her heart-tugging contrivances a solid realistic
grounding. (Even the villainous Simon Legree
sprang from accounts of a particularly brutal Louisiana overseer.) Her
aesthetic strategies were conventional, and made more so by Aiken; her
sense of factuality was not. Topsy’s anarchic impishness and Uncle
Tom’s submissive piety fit naturally into the complex, textured parable
of Christian redemption that Stowe—wife, daughter, and sister of
ministers—nurtured within her informed account of slavery. Only the
endless subsequent exploitation of her story’s sensationalist peaks
coarsened them into six decades of box-office triumph—followed by
decades of embarrassment over the stereotypes to which time and
mass-marketing had degraded Stowe’s characters. The romanticizing of
the “old South” that set in after Reconstruction shoveled the
degradation deeper.
The show’s history, all-pervasiveness followed by embarrassed
silence, explains why few living Americans have ever seen Uncle
Tom’s Cabin, but also why everyone has heard of it. Uncle Tom,
Topsy, Little Eva,
Simon
Legree,
and Eliza crossing the ice are all embedded in the public
mind, but only as the exaggerations they became. Retaining only the
cartoon images, memory has blanked out the facts (Legree is not Eliza’s
pursuer; Eva’s death moves Topsy to reform); it allows troubling
figures like St. Clare and Miss Ophelia to vanish altogether.
The willed amnesia endemic to our public life makes an effort
like
the Metropolitan’s salutary by definition. Additionally, Alex Roe’s
production solved many of the challenges involved by deploying his
sparse resources swiftly and lucidly. His actors, though uneven in
talent, all met the difficulty of their roles head-on: Marcie
Henderson (Eliza), George
Lee Miles (Uncle Tom), and Alex
Marshall-Brown (Topsy) found the germ of truth inside Aiken’s
ornate phrases; Peter
Tedeschi
found real fun in a white sympathizer’s by-cracky dialect. But greater
than their individual abilities was the gratifying sense of a
historical memory recaptured. Backsliding as our country currently is,
we need many more such reminders.